Based on the assumption that we are not dealing with 5 dimensional objects?
In a basically Euclidian geometric universe,and given the essential premise that all geomathematics are based on the hideosly limiting notion that 1+1=2, and not as Ustermayer correctly postulates, that 1 and2 are in fact the same thing observed from different precepts, the theoretical shapes described by Sidis must be; a poly-dri-doc-dec-ahooey-hedron, a hexa-sexa-hedro-adecon and a di-bi-dolly-he-deca-dodron. every thing else is poppycock. Don’t you agree?
Oh, sure, naturally, sounds delicious. Every thing else is poppycock and I’m allergic to poppycock products.
But I prefer the 5th dimension because my computer uses it…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza-Klein_theory
“In modern geometry, the extra fifth dimension can be understood to be the circle group U(1), as electromagnetism can essentially be formulated as a gauge theory on a fiber bundle, the circle bundle, with gauge group U(1).”
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
